Examining Black Phone 2 – Popular Scary Movie Continuation Heads Towards Elm Street

Debuting as the re-activated Stephen King machine was continuing to produce screen translations, without concern for excellence, The Black Phone felt like a lazy fanboy tribute. Set against a small town 70s backdrop, teenage actors, telepathic children and disturbing local antagonist, it was nearly parody and, like the very worst of his literary works, it was also clumsily packed.

Curiously the source was found within the household, as it was inspired by a compact narrative from King’s son Joe Hill, over-extended into a film that was a surprise $161m hit. It was the tale of the antagonist, a brutal murderer of young boys who would revel in elongating the ritual of their deaths. While molestation was avoided in discussion, there was something clearly non-heteronormative about the villain and the period references/societal fears he was obviously meant to represent, strengthened by Ethan Hawke portraying him with a distinctly flamboyant manner. But the film was too opaque to ever really admit that and even aside from that tension, it was excessively convoluted and too high on its wearisome vileness to work as only an unthinking horror entertainment.

Second Installment's Release Amidst Production Company Challenges

Its sequel arrives as previous scary movie successes the studio are in critical demand for a hit. Lately they've encountered difficulties to make anything work, from their werewolf film to their thriller to their action film to the utter financial disappointment of the robotic follow-up, and so a great deal rides on whether the continuation can prove whether a brief narrative can become a film that can generate multiple installments. But there's a complication …

Ghostly Evolution

The initial movie finished with our Final Boy Finn (the performer) defeating the antagonist, helped and guided by the spirits of previous victims. This situation has required writer-director Scott Derrickson and his writing partner Cargill to take the series and its killer to a new place, turning a flesh and blood villain into a paranormal entity, a path that leads them by way of Freddy's domain with a capability to return into the physical realm facilitated by dreams. But in contrast to the dream killer, the Grabber is noticeably uncreative and completely lacking comedy. The disguise stays effectively jarring but the movie has difficulty to make him as terrifying as he briefly was in the initial film, trapped by complicated and frequently unclear regulations.

Alpine Christian Camp Setting

The main character and his irritatingly profane sibling Gwen (the actress) confront him anew while snowed in at a mountain religious retreat for kids, the follow-up also referencing toward Freddy’s one-time nemesis Jason Voorhees. Gwen is guided there by an apparition of her deceased parent and what might be their late tormenter’s first victims while the brother, still attempting to handle his fury and recently discovered defensive skills, is pursuing to safeguard her. The writing is too ungainly in its contrived scene-setting, inelegantly demanding to maroon the main characters at a setting that will further contribute to background information for protagonist and antagonist, providing information we weren't particularly interested in or care to learn about. In what also feels like a more calculated move to guide the production in the direction of the comparable faith-based viewers that transformed the Conjuring movies into huge successes, Derrickson adds a religious element, with good now more closely associated with God and heaven while villainy signifies the devil and hell, religion the final defense against a monster like this.

Overcomplicated Story

The consequence of these choices is additional over-complicate a franchise that was previously almost failing, adding unnecessary complications to what could have been a straightforward horror movie. Frequently I discovered overly occupied with inquiries about the methods and reasons of feasible and unfeasible occurrences to feel all that involved. It’s a low-lift effort for the performer, whose features stay concealed but he maintains real screen magnetism that’s mostly missing elsewhere in the acting team. The location is at times remarkably immersive but the bulk of the persistently unfrightening scenes are flawed by a grainy 8mm texture to differentiate asleep and awake, an unsuccessful artistic decision that feels too self-aware and designed to reflect the terrifying uncertainty of experiencing a real bad dream.

Weak Continuation Rationale

Lasting approximately two hours, the sequel, comparable to earlier failures, is a unnecessarily lengthy and hugely unconvincing case for the creation of another series. When it calls again, I advise letting it go to voicemail.

  • Black Phone 2 debuts in Australian theaters on the sixteenth of October and in the US and UK on October 17
Daniel Reynolds
Daniel Reynolds

A passionate designer and writer sharing insights on creativity and innovation.