🔗 Share this article

During financial expansions, there come points where market analysts wonder if optimism has become excessive.

Latest multibillion-dollar deals between OpenAI and chip makers NVIDIA and AMD have sparked concerns about the sustainability behind substantial investments toward artificial intelligence systems.

Why these NVIDIA and AMD Deals Worrying for Market Observers?

Several commentators voice apprehension about the circular nature of these deals. According to the terms for NVIDIA's transaction, OpenAI will pay the chipmaker in cash to acquire chips, while the company commits to invest in OpenAI in exchange for non-controlling stakes.

Leading British technology backer James Anderson expressed concern about similarities to supplier funding, where a business offers financial support for a customer buying its products – a precarious situation when those buyers hold overly optimistic revenue projections.

Supplier funding proved to be one of the hallmarks during the turn-of-the-millennium dotcom craze.

"It is not exactly similar to the practices many telecom suppliers were up to during 1999-2000, yet it has certain rhymes with it. I'm not convinced it makes me feel completely comfortable from that point of view," remarked Anderson.

Meanwhile, the Advanced Micro Devices deal further enmeshes OpenAI alongside a second semiconductor manufacturer in addition to NVIDIA. Under the agreement, OpenAI plans to utilize hundreds of thousands of AMD processors within their data centers – the core infrastructure of artificial intelligence systems such as ChatGPT – and gaining the option to purchase ten percent in AMD.

Everything of this is fueled through the thirst of OpenAI as well as competitors to secure the maximum computing power available to drive their models to ever greater performance advancements – in addition to meet growing user demand.

Neil Wilson, British market strategist at investment bank Saxo, remarked how deals like those between NVIDIA & OpenAI collectively pointed to a situation which "appears, smells and sounds like a bubble."

What Are the Other Signs Pointing to a Bubble?

Anderson highlighted soaring valuations among prominent AI firms to be a further cause of concern. OpenAI is now worth $500bn (£372 billion), versus $157bn last October, while Anthropic almost trebled its valuation recently, rising from $60 billion in March up to $170bn the previous month.

Anderson commented that the magnitude of the value increases "concerned me." According to accounts, OpenAI reportedly posted sales amounting to $4.3 billion during the initial six months of the current year, alongside an operating loss of $7.8 billion, as reported by tech publication The Information.

Recent share price swings have also jolted seasoned market observers. As an example, AMD briefly added $80bn in valuation during stock market activity on Monday after the OpenAI announcement, whereas Oracle – one profiting from demand for AI support systems such as data centers – added approximately $250 billion over one day last month after reporting better than expected results.

Additionally, there exists an enormous investment spending boom, meaning spending on non-staff costs including facilities and hardware. The big four AI "large-scale operators" – Meta's parent Meta, Google owner Alphabet, Microsoft together with Amazon – are expected to spend $325 billion on capex in the current year, approximately the GDP belonging to Portugal.

Is Artificial Intelligence Implementation Justifying Market Excitement?

Confidence in artificial intelligence expansion was rattled in August when MIT released a study indicating how 95% of organizations are getting zero return on money spent toward AI generation tools. Their report stated the problem lay not in the capabilities of AI systems but how they were used.

The report indicated this represented an obvious example of the "genAI divide", where startups headed by 19- or 20-year-olds reporting significant increases in income from using AI technologies.

These findings occurred alongside a substantial decline among AI infrastructure stocks including Nvidia and Oracle. This happened 60 days following consulting firm McKinsey, the advisory group, reported that four out of five businesses state they using generative AI, however an identical proportion report no significant effect upon their bottom line.

McKinsey explained this occurs because AI systems are utilized for general applications like producing conference summaries rather than specific uses such as identifying risky vendors and producing concepts.

All of this worries backers because a key commitment from AI companies like Alphabet, OpenAI and Microsoft is that if you buy their products, they will improve efficiency – an indicator of economic performance – by helping a single worker produce significantly greater economically valuable output during a typical working day.

Nevertheless, we see other obvious indications of broad embrace of AI. This week, OpenAI announced that ChatGPT currently used by 800 million users a week, rising from the figure of 500 million mentioned by the company in March. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, firmly believes that demand for paid-for services to AI is going to continue to "sharply rise."

What Does the Overall Situation Show?

Adrian Cox, an investment strategist at the Deutsche Bank Research Institute, says the current situation feels like "we are at a crossroads when the lights show varying colors."

The red lights, he notes, include massive capital expenditure where "existing versions of processors might become outdated prior to spending yields returns" together with rapidly increasing market caps for privately-held firms such as OpenAI.

Cautionary indicators involve over double of the share prices of the "top seven" US technology stocks. This is offset through their price to earnings ratios – an assessment of whether a stock is under- or overvalued – which are under past averages